Time of call - 05:11:13
First three appliances mobilised - 05:12:33
Time elapsed - 00:01:20
First attendance (Exeter Danes Castle) - 05:18:49
Time elapsed - 00:07:36
10 fire engines mobilised - 05:24:21
Time elapsed - 00:13:08
15 fire engines mobilised - 05:33:38
Time elapsed - 00:22:25
Fifth fire engine arrives - 05:40:06
Time elapsed - 00:28:53
Tenth fire engine arrives - 05:50:33
Time elapsed - 00:39:20
20 fire engines mobilised - 05:59:17
Time elapsed - 00:48:04
15th fire engine arrives - 06:04:16
Time elapsed - 00:53:03
20th fire engine arrives - 06:35:07
Time elapsed - 01:23:54
- The fire started in the building at 18 Cathedral Yard in the early hours of Friday 28 October 2016. The Service received the first 999 call at 5.11am. The incident was declared a Major Incident at 5.42am.
- The Service’s Fire Control received 54 emergency calls about the fire.
- The first appliance was ordered at 5.12am and arrived at the scene six minutes later, at 5.18am.
- The first appliance to attend was crewed by on-call firefighters from Danes Castle Fire Station.
- The wholetime crew from Danes Castle was already attending a serious road traffic collision on the A30 at the time of the fire.
- Some of the initial calls reported a fire in the High Street so a number of the initial appliances to attend went to High Street so may not have been immediately visible from Cathedral Yard.
- There were four fire appliances at the scene within 20 minutes of the 999 call, 15 fire appliances had attended within 53 minutes.
- At the height of the incident, there were around 150 firefighters actively involved in the firefighting operation and 207 firefighters were at the scene at the same time during one hand-over period. There were around 100 firefighters at the scene for the first three days of the incident around the clock.
- At the height of the incident, 27 pumping appliances were actively involved in the firefighting operation. During one hand-over period, there were 57 fire service vehicles at the scene, including 38 pumping appliances (fire engines). There were four aerial appliances at the scene at the same time.
Did the Service scale down its attendance?
- The fire service presence at the incident quickly rose to 15 pumping appliances within 53 minutes which is a standard response to a fire of that severity.
- Due to reports from the police that not everyone had identified as having evacuated safely, five additional appliances were mobilised for resources and breathing apparatus so that firefighters could search the hotel room by room and carry out rescues as required. Fortunately, there were no members of the public left inside the building.
- When the search and rescue operation was completed the attendance returned to 15 appliances and then increased again when required.
Why did the fire spread into the Royal Clarence Hotel?
- We believe the fire spread through voids and spaces created by the age and proximity of the buildings, the materials used and the nature of the construction of the old, complex and timber-built buildings. We believe these factors enabled the fire to spread through the adjacent interconnected buildings of the Well House public house and Royal Clarence Hotel, built in 1791. We had crews fighting the fire and attempting to stop fire spread from inside the Royal Clarence throughout the incident.
What were the Service's priorities?
- The Service's first priority at an incident is always to save lives and then to protect property. Once the search and rescue operation had established that everyone had been accounted for inside the hotel, the priority was to protect the historically important buildings from lateral fire spread. Advice from a local historian informed the Service's plan as to the most historically significant buildings.
- The Service worked with other agencies to keep the impact on the community as low as possible and protect public safety from the smoke plume and potential structural collapse of affected buildings.
Was the gas supply a problem?
- The gas supply involved in the fire added to the complexity of the firefighting operation and the potential risks to the firefighters involved. Gas engineers worked extremely hard to turn off the gas supply to the Royal Clarence Hotel. In order to isolate the gas supply, pipes had to be capped in three different places, one of which required drilling through concrete to make it safe.
Why did it take so long to put out?
- Having completed the search and rescue operation, the construction of the ancient buildings involved and the intensity of the fire led to an extremely challenging and complex incident. Due to the likelihood of roof and building collapse presenting a risk to firefighter safety, firefighting had to be carried out from outside the building. This was the most significant building fire in Devon or Somerset for many years.
Was there a lack of water?
The fire hydrants performed as expected throughout the incident. However, as the incident progressed the number of pumping appliances being used at the incident started to overwhelm the water supply from High Street so a High Volume Pump was used to draw water directly from the River Exe. A pump on one of the appliances which was supplying water to an aerial appliance failed while at the scene and it took approximately 20 mins for it to be replaced. Firefighting tactics were adjusted to account for this and crews continued to fight the fire whilst the aerial was not in use. More information on firefighting tactics will be available in the full report.
What was done to save other heritage buildings in the area?
There are a number of shops and buildings directly connected to the Royal Clarence Hotel. Throughout the incident, crews worked tirelessly to prevent the fire from spreading to these and other surrounding buildings. A large number of firefighters wearing breathing apparatus tackled the fire from inside the rear of the row of shops in High Street which are directly adjacent to the rear of the affected buildings in Cathedral Yard (including Laura Ashley and Costa Coffee). Many other historically important buildings in the immediate area were protected by firefighters with foam and water.
Why were cordons put in place?
Cordons were put in place until we knew that the buildings were structurally safe. They were constantly being assessed and reduced when it was safe to do so. Fire Service Business Support Officers were helping local businesses, including Marks & Spencer and Tesco, to open as soon as possible by advising them on how they could open with adequate fire safety arrangements in those conditions.
Did the Service have a plan of the hotel?
The Service has a Site Specific Risk Information plan for the hotel which is accessible electronically on mobile data terminals carried in all fire appliances.
What was the cause of the fire?
Investigators were not able to examine the scene. The severity of the fire limited the extent of the investigation but fire officers will continue to work with other agencies, such as the police and the Health & Safety Executive, and assist insurance companies as appropriate.
Fire service resources used (as of 7 November 2016)
Total pumping appliances used (includes repeat visits by the same appliance)
Total number of firefighters on fire engines
Different fire engines that attended (does not include repeat visits by the same appliance)
Different fire service vehicles that attended
Different aerial ladder platforms that attended
Maximum number of firefighters on scene at the same time
Maximum number of fire engines on scene at the same time
Maximum number of fire service vehicles on scene at the same time
Total firefighter hours at the incident
Including total hours committed by on-call firefighters
Different officers who attended (does not include repeat visits by the same officer)
Officer hours at the incident
Maximum number of officers on scene at the same time
After the fire
Understandably, people had questions about how the fire service tackled the fire and what resources were used. The Service produced a report (PDF) of the incident to provide the communities of Devon and Somerset with the facts.
Cathedral Yard fire review
The Sector Commander responsible for the Royal Clarence area on the night of the fire claimed that parts of his account of the incident were purposefully kept out of the report. The allegation also implied that the fire which spread into the Royal Clarence Hotel was not previously identified or covered in other independent reports.
On 28 January 2019, the Service asked the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) to peer review the report and its findings. This was to provide an independent view from people who understand operational tactics and reporting. Read the Terms of Reference (PDF) for the review.
Experienced fire officers working on behalf of the NFCC reviewed the information collected by interviewing 21 people who either witnessed or were involved in the incident. Accounts were checked against each other to build an accurate picture of what happened. They also asked to speak with the Sector Commander for the Royal Clarence area, who declined to be interviewed.
On 20 December 2019, the independent review (PDF) by the National Fire Chief’s Council was published.